INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEW REPORT Independent. Review conducted by: Seve Kost TSoa)

Area(s) of- ‘Expertise: - Review senaneaced at: ] -YSA (Time) , q / Hie (Date)

Filet: 95-2876 16

Laboratory #(s):; _P/OO FO0F VOSAZ 009 GON 30/7

Examiner(s) & Symbols

Reviewed Not Reviewed Reviewed Not Reviewed —

RQ. of D O o ga 0 ev BA ek a oO

D O ) Oo

Materials Reviewed Trial testimony transcript(s) of:

Testimony Date(s): Pages:

‘Laboratory Report(s):

Laboratory Number: 404130 30 7 Date: MAY 10 199

Laboratory Number: Gos SAFO F Date: Jury 25 1989

hicaes Number: _ 4/00 400 Date: DEC 28 1989 Examiner Bench Notes of: Ke Q AVYD UNENDW,) TEecCHWId AN

Laboratory Number: q 0413017

Laboratory Number: q OS 2L004

Laboratory Number: a { OO¢ 00x |

Page f of u

- Initials: SHE CRM - 14951

Was any other material reviewed? > ait Yes GQ No

If yes, please identify and/or describe the material: _Qubm TTAG AGENY LETTER OATED

A pare 111984 |

Results of Review

File #: S- 7 Item or Specimen # Reviewed: Q | -Q elo Kl “KS

Review of Laboratory Report(s) and Bench Notes:

Note: Numbered comments are required below or on

additional pages for any “No” or “Unable to Determine” Responses

1) Did the examiner perform the appropriate tests in a scientifically acceptable manner, based on the methods, protocols, and analytic techniques available at the time of the origin4l examination(s)? OYes ONo Unable to Determine 2) Are the examination results set forth in the laboratory repor{éS) supported and adequately documented in the

bench notes? G Yes No OQ Unable to Determine

Review of Testimony:

Note: Numbered comments are required below or on

additional pages for any “No” or “Unable to Determine” Responses

Fin not available,

3) Testimony consistent with the laboratory report(s)? ° OYes ONo O Unable to Determine 4) Testimony consistent with the bench notes? OYes ONo = O Unable to Determine

2) Testimony within bounds of examiner's expertise? qgYes GNo- € Unable to Determine

Page © of d Initials “7

—-—-— Ps -

soe ecaiteact Oe re

Comments (Set forth by above question #, if applicable. Use “Additional Comments” Sheet, if needed) : tt Tike OUMENTA TION /S (MSUFFICLEUT To Of T*MIOE /F THE

ES7TS JERE

VACFURMED prt Fe SCIEMTIFICALL ACCEPTABLE” MANNER,

He MeSulis ARE Not

THe wots ARE wot DATED, MOST ARE wp PENCIL. - AD ALE sbT

os | . WNTIAtheED bY Tre TECHWiej AD, (HE NUMbCH OF HAIL AVAILABLE gad GXAMIXED IS vol DreuMmeEnT ED, / te TECHANCIBND MAKES Nd NOTA TIEA

TH Ail WAS df WIAs VOT LECWWUERED AWD MOUNTED ChE Motr

EYTED sa) THE MOTES,

(tems, EseeciArey OF, wHtee Tee Examiner nores DESCRIBE Tite”

ee Huh E

| A Con FlemAtio) OF THe HHUA ComPAhI Sd Was AffA RewmLy OOTAWED Fhom AveTiter Quauried@) examwek, But THE CONFIRMATION SHEET DOES WOO _SAECIFY Wich 3 Specimens weer

Review completed at: § 4 S4a (Time) , Gil Y | FF ate)

BRE SbdnE GRASURGES te Tite’

HAIR RECEERED,

MOTE SS, .

Total time spent conducting review (to nearest 1/4 hour): [ oak.

[ hereby certify that I conducted this review in an ee manner and that the results of my review are fully documented on this report consisting of a total of pages.

GD L¢- FF

(Signature) (Date)

Page 2 of | Initials Mi

cn cos 4

Additional Comments (Set forth by question #, if applicable)

Files: _ VE~AE Vol be | ) | | EXANWED,

Te ChAWMMEZR. Dh) WT REPOAT Tite =f RFSEMCE OF AIC.

DIF FERRT Thaw THE Victim And Susfeczr Fount) on) QT,

| : ;

Page a of 4

Initials: Spl